Air flow France – Egypt Air close to midair collision over Belgium

Air flow France – Egypt Air close to midair collision over Belgium




Air France – Egypt Air near midair accident over Belgium

Do the Egypt Air pilot celebration too much on New Years? The midair collision was narrowly prevented near the Belgian city of Ghent upon New Year’ s Day whenever two planes came close to colliding, according to local media reports.

Two planes, one of these an Air France passenger aircraft, had a mid-air near miss within the Ghent region over Belgium upon 1 January. The distance between the 2 aircraft was 90 meters within altitude and 1, 370 metres (0. 8 miles) horizontally. A good Egyptian cargo plane is said to get ignored instructions as many as three times.

The Air Accident Investigation Unit (AAIU) of the federal Mobility Department offers started an investigation into a serious occurrence in the airspace near Ghent (East Flanders) on New Year’ s i9000 Day.

An Silk cargo plane, an  Airbus A300, had taken off from the regional airport terminal of Ostend and nearly mixed with an Air France passenger aircraft bound for Amsterdam.

The Egypt Air plane has been gaining altitude as it was certain for Cologne, while the French airplane, which had taken off near Paris, france, was preparing for landing.

According to the first findings from the report, pilots of Egypt Air flow were ordered to stop gaining höhe three times. When both were arriving closer to one another, the TCAS notify system automatically started. This triggers an alarm in the cockpit, however the Egyptian crew allegedly ignored this particular as well.

In the end, the two were on 22, 000 feet altitude around when the near miss took place. This particular happened above Lozer, south associated with Ghent near Kruishoutem (picture). The particular report is talking of “ a critical incident”.

The Belgian air traffic control center Belgocontrol said it reported the occurrence immediately to the AAIU. Spokesman Dominique Dehaene said, “ traffic controllers did their job correctly. ”