People want no increase in airport fees

People want no increase in airport fees

  eTN Article:

Tourists United, a Washington-based advocacy team for travelers, issued the following declaration regarding the DeFazio/Massie bill: “ America’ s aviation consumers don’ to deserve an increase in airport fees. ”

“ Couple of members of the public have to deal with so many random fees and fees ranging from TSA Protection Fees and airport fees in order to airline fees from everything from chair reservations to pillows and blanket, ” according to Charles Leocha, Leader of Travelers United. “ Its about time that the regions of our country that will benefit directly from airport activity plus business pay their fair discuss. Consumers have had enough and currently pay a fair share. ”

US Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR), ranking member of the House Transport and Infrastructure Committee, and panel member Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) announced a bill that would uncap the particular airport passenger facility charge (PFC), allowing airports to charge people more than the current $4. 50 for each enplanement fee.

When passed, the bill will also reduce $400 million from Airport Enhancement Program (AIP) grants. Large airport terminal hubs would have to forgo AIP money in order to have the ability to charge above the present $4. 50 fee.

Every director of every airport across the nation will proclaim that their airport terminal is the economic engine of their area. However , the regions’ businesses are not really paying their fair share designed for airport construction and operations. Travellers are being stuck with the bill.

The current passenger facility fees (PFCs) are being used to guarantee funding of municipal bonds and have recently been committed far into the future. The advantages to passengers today are nearly non-existent.

Passengers are the ones to pay parking fees, foods court fees, retail fees, taxi cab fees, rental car fees, and more to help keep the airports running to provide their regions. It is time that the close by industrial property owners and businesses pay money for the airports that makes their property really worth more than random pasture lands.

Owners of massive car port that serve airports and carrental companies need to pay their share. Homeowners of the office parks that have mushroomed around airports should be paying their particular fair share. Hotel owners ought to be shouldering their share of airport terminal costs and improvements. Without an airport terminal, all these businesses would go breast.

“ PFC consumer fees are already exorbitant and aviators consumers are paying enough, ” based on Leocha. “ The metropolitan areas which are benefiting from the massive economic effect that airports deliver should spend their fair share. Stop making use of airline passengers like a bottomless money box. ”


About eTurboNews

Original eTN articles are editorially regulated according to news values, significance, and accuracy, copyright protected, and independent of any advertising and sponsorship carried unless clearly marked otherwise.

  • Click here for more original content on eTurboNews.
  • Click here to subscribe to the eTN Daily or Weekly e-newsletter.
  • Click here to submit story ideas.