Jeff Sessions tries to time travel the 1980s with his drug war but we refuse to go back

WASHINGTON, D.C. - FEBRUARY 28: U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions delivers remarks at the Justice Department's 2017 African American History Month Observation at the Department of Justice on February 28, 2017 in Washington, D.C. The event also included a showing of the documentary "Too Important to Fail: Saving America's Boys." (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)

With his memo returning back to mandatory minimums last week, Jeff Sessions set the nation’s progress on criminal justice reform back decades.

Jeff Sessions doesn’t like progress. At least, it’s obvious that he does not like progress when it comes to criminal justice reform. Instead, he prefers an approach that will take us back in time to harsh penalties for drug offenders and continue to fill our prisons with black and brown bodies. His recent policy announcement to undo the Obama administration’s guidelines on drug sentencing by restoring mandatory minimums served to roll back progress decades. And criminal justice reform advocates in the Senate are not accepting Sessions’ new policy announcement without a fight.

“The Sessions memo is like traveling back in time to the 1980s,” Bruce Western, a professor of criminal justice policy at Harvard University, said. “From the chief law enforcement officer in the country, you’ve got an endorsement of tough-on-crime criminal justice policy.” […]

On Tuesday, in response to Sessions’ policy announcement, Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy proposed legislation more in line with Holder’s approach: It would allow judges to tailor sentences on a case-by-case basis, regardless of whether a mandatory minimum sentence applies. Paul said these minimums have a racially disparate impact, and that Sessions’ policy shift would “accentuate” that “injustice.” He also said his bill would save the DOJ money—the department currently spends nearly a third of its budget on corrections. A group of House members plan to introduce similar legislation.

This is the slow march toward progress that had been years in the making before Sessions got in the way. Under Eric Holder’s watch, the Justice Department during the Obama administration had instructed federal prosecutors to avoid charging certain offenders (such as those with first-time offenses or low-level drug charges) with anything that would trigger mandatory minimums. As a result, the federal inmate population on drug charges dropped in 2014, has decreased substantially since (40 percent) and there was bipartisan support for moving away from mandatory minimums. In a country that has the highest incarceration rate in the world, lawmakers, judges and other key stakeholders were finally beginning to understand that the cost of imprisoning people for nonviolent drug charges or first-time offenses is costly and has a devastating impact on communities of color.